Retailers today face an interesting challenge, and competitive opportunity brought on by the growing customer demand for personalized products, recommendations and experiences. To successfully achieve this personalization, the delivery process for brands involves a necessary exchange, one that can be notably problematic if not handled properly.
Many consumers are prepared to take part in this exchange – relinquishing their personal information in order to receive desired commodities (tangible or intangible.) But brands must also take responsibility for negotiating this as a “fair value exchange,” by gaining trust and maintaining customer security, in order to be successful.
How generation plays in
As customer experience professionals studying this increase in demand for hyper-personalization closely, it is clear to us that there is a generational factor at play. A recent Gongos survey of participants across the millennial, Gen X and baby boomer generations found that over half of millennial consumers were willing to share their fingerprints and facial details with retailers if it meant:
- a more convenient experience (55%) percent)
- customized products and services (55 percent)
- real-time promotions (52 percent)
Comparatively, Gen X and baby boomers reported lower numbers in all three of these delivery methods, with baby boomer willingness never exceeding 20 percent.
The opportunity for brands
The openness of consumers to give away highly sensitive personal data indicates a strong desire for personalization and a very powerful opportunity for brands. As consumer expectations for tailored treatment continue to escalate, the increased value of personal data also becomes evident. Possible delivery methods to personalization include products and services, but also experiences and promotions. While the above data offers a fairly balanced representation of the different delivery methods desired by millennial consumers, the growing desire for experience alone (especially compared to their older counterparts) has been well documented.
The risk
This vast opportunity for companies today is not something to be taken for granted, given the high risk of compromising consumers’ information, and subsequently their trust. Looking back at massive data breaches like Facebook and Target, it makes sense that consumer confidence has become more guarded in recent years. Brands simultaneously hold the ability to build and destroy their customers’ trust, and it is essential for them to understand this in order to have successful customer relationships. These bonds can require years of positive actions to be cultivated, and sometimes only a single incorrect action occurring in a short time period can harm or neutralize trust.
Need for authenticity
Customer sentiment today (particularly among millennials) highlights the strategic imperative for retailers to authentically deliver personalization to their customers, and in a time-sensitive manner. Maintaining that flow of information will require brands to respond, not only through the creation of tailored deliverables, but through accountability for how they choose to earn and cultivate consumer trust.
Takeaway
It often helps to understand that personalization is not always linear. Correctly pinpointing the forms that provide the most value to consumers is an ongoing process. Brands should also remember that implementing and continually fostering a type of “fair value exchange” with consumers is generally necessary to ensure their survival. If personalization is done effectively and in a trustworthy manner, brands can look forward to long-term positive results such as stronger loyalty, deeper engagement and meaningful growth.
Opinions expressed in this article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Marketing Land. Staff authors are listed here.
About The Author
As Chief Innovation Officer (CInO) of Gongos, Inc., Greg is charged with accelerating the future of everything – from trends and foresights to product innovation and development, to the company’s growth and performance. Greg thrives on exploring societal and technological shifts that point to disruptive ways to create value for consumers and resilience for organizations. Greg leads the company’s Innovation Think Tank – a cross-generational team that fosters a culture of innovation and guides long-term strategy in shaping the decision intelligence space. A former research practitioner with over 20 years of experience under his belt, Greg is a visionary at heart. He believes our industry is in the midst of a revolution, and plans to help pave the way. He holds an M.A. in Humanistic and Clinical Psychology from the Michigan School of Professional Psychology, and a B.S. in Industrial Administration, Marketing and Finance Concentrations from Kettering University.
This marketing news is not the copyright of Scott.Services – please click here to see the original source of this article. Author:
For more SEO, PPC, internet marketing news please check out https://news.scott.services
Why not check out our SEO, PPC marketing services at https://www.scott.services
We’re also on:
https://www.facebook.com/scottdotservices/
https://twitter.com/scottdsmith
https://plus.google.com/112865305341039147737
The post Why hyper-personalization demands a fair value exchange appeared first on Scott.Services Online Marketing News.
source https://news.scott.services/why-hyper-personalization-demands-a-fair-value-exchange/
No comments:
Post a Comment